Conquest of the Horde

(10-13-2011, 04:31 PM)rodentjoe Wrote: [ -> ]Not to mention, Oxhorn proved that forsaken and tauren can have kids
*shiver*
Dead-cowbies...

Wait, wat?

(10-24-2011, 02:41 PM)Krent Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-13-2011, 04:31 PM)rodentjoe Wrote: [ -> ]Not to mention, Oxhorn proved that forsaken and tauren can have kids
*shiver*
Dead-cowbies...

Wait, wat?

Forsaken are -not- fertile. They broke free from the Scourge, then their numbers went lower, lower and lower as no more Forsaken if no more Forsaken would break free. When Lich King fell, a few Val'kyr joined the Forsaken, raising corpses as 'new' Forsaken. If you want undead cowman, raise a dead tauren.

It was on an episode by Oxhorn. The Undead married a Tauren and they had dead Cowbies. It's just a joke.

Pretty much what Flying Squirrel said.

As far as Beltharean's point goes I think the logic is a little far reaching. If A is compatible with B, B is compatible with C, then does that automatically mean A is compatible with C? I can't think of a reason why not, but Blizzard would have surely made more half-things in the D20 at least, or a half-race template. I would go with the logic that if it hasn't shown to exist, then it probably doesn't exist.

For those actually contemplating it though it's best to go with Xigo's advice of half-breeds we actually know exist. It should also be noted that there can be some deep implications to interracial children, with the most acceptable probably being human/high elf.

Personally, I think people put waaaaay too much thought into the logic and science behind fantasy-land mutt babies. This is a video game where people survive on an exploded planet fragments, tiny four-fingered people invent mind control helmets, and gigantic monstrosities walk freely and unimpaired in normal gravity.

It's all verily easy to explain...

Eh. We listen to Science somewhat. Otherwise, we would still have 300 year childhoods and such

(10-25-2011, 03:32 PM)FlyingSquirrel Wrote: [ -> ]Eh. We listen to Science somewhat. Otherwise, we would still have 300 year childhoods and such

We changed that due to better lore sources, not because of SCIENCE.

/shrug

Seems like a large part of it was still based off of Science, no less. The lore sources were an excerpt here, a sentence there.

I'm curious as to why no one has cited Med'an.

Would not the son of a human Guardian of Tirisfal and a half-orc, half-draenei abomination be especially relevant?

(10-25-2011, 04:36 PM)LostStranger Wrote: [ -> ]I'm curious as to why no one has cited Med'an.

Would not the son of a human Guardian of Tirisfal and a half-orc, half-draenei abomination be especially relevant?

To my knowledge, everyone tries to deny his existence.

(10-25-2011, 04:43 PM)imagenashyun Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-25-2011, 04:36 PM)LostStranger Wrote: [ -> ]I'm curious as to why no one has cited Med'an.

Would not the son of a human Guardian of Tirisfal and a half-orc, half-draenei abomination be especially relevant?

To my knowledge, everyone tries to deny his existence.

Who now?

No matter how much you cover your ears and go LA LA LA LA, it doesn't make Me'dan exist any less.

Besides, his whole family line are canon sues anyway.

If Med'an does get put in the game, I hope he gets corrupted by an Old God so I can kill him.

I have to agree that I think it is more than possibe within reason. Humans I can see mixing with all sorts of beings from orcs to trolls. Hell, in most lore it is even possible for a mixed breed child to happen if the other parent is a dragon who had shifted. While I would not recommend that one because of balance issues...I think the idea is reasonable. Of course, I still don't think that some mixes are possible...like Tauren with any other race or undead at all. Half orcs, elves, dwarves...those are reasonable though. All the same, it is up to the one making it and the GMs, as I can be easily sold if there is an explaination for it. =D