12-07-2011, 10:44 AM
Spoiler:
(12-07-2011, 06:25 AM)Rigley Wrote: [ -> ]May have already been stated, but perhaps a good alternative would be to just have the guild explain its need for the subforum, and approve it if it seems worthy?
That would be what I believe to be the sentiment behind my first post, way up there...
...Pardon, pray, my incomprehensibly elaborate way of putting it.
(12-07-2011, 09:57 AM)Reigen Wrote: [ -> ]A member requirement could be one of the things needed if the person handling the request does not know the guild and needs some proof of activity of interest in the guild.
I distrust the idea of minimum fame or minimum membership in order to acquire a subforum.
Using either or both as a par...
Mm. Though I wouldn't be personally impeded at all, since my guild is both prolific and glaring, I would much rather see an application system implemented in a "freeform" capacity.
A template of questions, yes, but not so that they would need to answer within an arbitrary and specific criteria or be automatically rebuffed.
(12-07-2011, 09:57 AM)Reigen Wrote: [ -> ]Each request would be handled case-by-case I assume as there are different circumstances for each guild.
...but I think you've a clear idea of the root concept being put into practice here.
Though whether I do is another matter.