(09-03-2011, 03:00 PM)Grakor456 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-03-2011, 01:10 PM)Roxas65 Wrote: [ -> ]I've missed most of this discussion and I can't remember what the heel I read when I did follow it. Can't even remember what the eff I voted. Could somebody just quickly explain the limits to the free form system?
A lot of this will be better defined as we continue on and we run into individual problems, and a lot of this is somewhat subjective. Characters that currently exist should all be fine, barring model changes (fel-sworn) and Demon Hunters.
Don't go too far away from your chosen class (and especially don't go into a class not available to your race,) don't be OP, and don't be meta-gamey. Also, claiming titles that imply significant power (Archmage, Archdruid, whatevah) is bad, except possibly as ranks within a guild.
That's it? I can live with that. thanks, Grakbro.
So, what about spell breakers?
Too far out there?
Spell breakers should be fine.
Fantastic.
Here's to hoping it works in this new system.
/Steeples fingers.
Excellent. This is even better than I had been hoping for!
Wait, wait.
If we're asking what's okay...
What about Pyremasters?
(09-03-2011, 07:08 PM)hiddengecko Wrote: [ -> ]/Steeples fingers.
Excellent. This is even better than I had been hoping for!
^
My first thought after choosing Free Form on the Poll was, "Uh... should I revote?" because I thought it would not work as well as it sounds like it will. <3 Grakor.
On a random, off topic note, Grakor and Roxas almost have the same numbers.
(09-03-2011, 07:21 PM)Aphetoros Wrote: [ -> ]No necromancers?
Not a GM or Forum Helper or... anything of power but my first assumption would be "A-OK" only because at one point they were from Special(or regular?) profiles. My 2ยข
(09-03-2011, 07:19 PM)FlyingSquirrel Wrote: [ -> ]Wait, wait.
If we're asking what's okay...
What about Pyremasters?
Sure, why not?
(09-03-2011, 07:21 PM)Aphetoros Wrote: [ -> ]No necromancers?
Sure, why not? (If you do this, roll as a mage and say he's studying necromancy on the side. Don't get caught though, neither the Horde nor the Alliance take kindly to you necromantic types.)
Runemaster?
Techmage?
Steamwarrior?
Candymancer? (ok... I made that one up but still!)
(09-03-2011, 08:20 PM)rodentjoe Wrote: [ -> ]Runemaster?
Somewhat hesitant on full-blown Runemasters, as they're essentially a construct for the d20 and didn't really get any sort of spotlight in WoW. That said, the idea of using runes to augment ones abilities is a valid one (and essentially the explanation of the inscription profession) and there's nothing stopping a warrior from learning inscription, putting runes on his body, and equipping fist weapons...
Quote:Techmage?
Steamwarrior?
Candymancer? (ok... I made that one up but still!)
Sure, why not? (Candymancer is just silly, though.)
(09-03-2011, 08:53 PM)Grakor456 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-03-2011, 08:20 PM)rodentjoe Wrote: [ -> ]Runemaster?
Somewhat hesitant on full-blown Runemasters, as they're essentially a construct for the d20 and didn't really get any sort of spotlight in WoW. That said, the idea of using runes to augment ones abilities is a valid one (and essentially the explanation of the inscription profession) and there's nothing stopping a warrior from learning inscription, putting runes on his body, and equipping fist weapons...
Quote:Techmage?
Steamwarrior?
Candymancer? (ok... I made that one up but still!)
Sure, why not? (Candymancer is just silly, though.)
On that note, we can conjure muffins and croissants and bagels and such. The father of one of my characters and teacher of another was a candy-conjurer. So I suppose you could open up a shop where you sell delicious conjured pastries!
...Oh great, now I want candy.
But, I see your point on Runemasters, and it does make sense if one wants a fist-fighter. /nodnod.
Also, does that mean that, on a much more minor note, that Cyan tattoos will be a possibility to get once again?