The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined array key "fragment" - Line: 1494 - File: inc/class_parser.php PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/inc/class_parser.php 1494 errorHandler->error_callback
/inc/class_parser.php 1640 postParser->mycode_parse_video
[PHP] postParser->mycode_parse_video_callback
/inc/class_parser.php 513 preg_replace_callback
/inc/class_parser.php 228 postParser->parse_mycode
/inc/functions_post.php 817 postParser->parse_message
/showthread.php 1118 build_postbit
Warning [2] Undefined array key 0 - Line: 1587 - File: inc/class_parser.php PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/inc/class_parser.php 1587 errorHandler->error_callback
/inc/class_parser.php 1640 postParser->mycode_parse_video
[PHP] postParser->mycode_parse_video_callback
/inc/class_parser.php 513 preg_replace_callback
/inc/class_parser.php 228 postParser->parse_mycode
/inc/functions_post.php 817 postParser->parse_message
/showthread.php 1118 build_postbit
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval
Warning [2] Undefined variable $forumjump - Line: 89 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 89 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Someone is going to anyway...
#16
(09-03-2011, 03:00 PM)Grakor456 Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 01:10 PM)Roxas65 Wrote: I've missed most of this discussion and I can't remember what the heel I read when I did follow it. Can't even remember what the eff I voted. Could somebody just quickly explain the limits to the free form system?

A lot of this will be better defined as we continue on and we run into individual problems, and a lot of this is somewhat subjective. Characters that currently exist should all be fine, barring model changes (fel-sworn) and Demon Hunters.

Don't go too far away from your chosen class (and especially don't go into a class not available to your race,) don't be OP, and don't be meta-gamey. Also, claiming titles that imply significant power (Archmage, Archdruid, whatevah) is bad, except possibly as ranks within a guild.



That's it? I can live with that. thanks, Grakbro.
[Image: 293D4BE4-7170-4C2A-B8BF-7EA572513EBD.jpg]
Spoiler:
[Image: Lazuri65.png]
Reply
#17
So, what about spell breakers?
Too far out there?
Reply
#18
Spell breakers should be fine.
Have you hugged an orc today?
- I am not tech support. Please do not contact me regarding technical issues. -
Reply
#19
Fantastic.
Here's to hoping it works in this new system.
Reply
#20
/thumbs-up.

I like.
[Image: 2hhkp3k.gif]
Recommended reads: Divine and Arcane. Also, elves.
Wanna refer me in Tribes: Ascend? Clickies!
Reply
#21
/Steeples fingers.

Excellent. This is even better than I had been hoping for!
i am geko
i live heer
and my favorite food is crikkits
Reply
#22
Wait, wait.
If we're asking what's okay...
What about Pyremasters?
Reply
#23
No necromancers?
[Image: Ml7sNnX.gif]
Reply
#24
(09-03-2011, 07:08 PM)hiddengecko Wrote: /Steeples fingers.

Excellent. This is even better than I had been hoping for!
^
My first thought after choosing Free Form on the Poll was, "Uh... should I revote?" because I thought it would not work as well as it sounds like it will. <3 Grakor.

On a random, off topic note, Grakor and Roxas almost have the same numbers.
(09-03-2011, 07:21 PM)Aphetoros Wrote: No necromancers?

Not a GM or Forum Helper or... anything of power but my first assumption would be "A-OK" only because at one point they were from Special(or regular?) profiles. My 2ยข
Delta Wrote: I couldn't help but watch that with a smile. It's comparable to watching a kitten climb onto the sofa and mew excitably, as if it's just achieved something monumental.

[Image: Sasuke-gifs-uchiha-sasuke-22778910-500-220.gif]

Spoiler:
Lithdra -- Blood Elf -- 85
Aitana -- Forsaken -- 85
Kymu -- Draenei -- 85
Anrielle -- Night Elf -- 85
Kravus -- Blood Elf -- 60
Rinkata -- Troll -- 60
Nicci -- Goblin -- 60
Reply
#25
(09-03-2011, 07:19 PM)FlyingSquirrel Wrote: Wait, wait.
If we're asking what's okay...
What about Pyremasters?

Sure, why not?

(09-03-2011, 07:21 PM)Aphetoros Wrote: No necromancers?

Sure, why not? (If you do this, roll as a mage and say he's studying necromancy on the side. Don't get caught though, neither the Horde nor the Alliance take kindly to you necromantic types.)
Have you hugged an orc today?
- I am not tech support. Please do not contact me regarding technical issues. -
Reply
#26
(09-03-2011, 07:45 PM)Grakor456 Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 07:19 PM)FlyingSquirrel Wrote: Wait, wait.
If we're asking what's okay...
What about Pyremasters?

Sure, why not?

(09-03-2011, 07:21 PM)Aphetoros Wrote: No necromancers?

Sure, why not? (If you do this, roll as a mage and say he's studying necromancy on the side. Don't get caught though, neither the Horde nor the Alliance take kindly to you necromantic types.)
Unless you're Forsaken.
Reply
#27
Grakor Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 07:21 PM)Aphetoros Wrote: No necromancers?

Sure, why not? (If you do this, roll as a mage and say he's studying necromancy on the side. Don't get caught though, neither the Horde nor the Alliance take kindly to you necromantic types.)



Meloveyoulongtime.
[Image: Ml7sNnX.gif]
Reply
#28
Runemaster?
Techmage?
Steamwarrior?
Candymancer? (ok... I made that one up but still!)
With a hip, hip and a clippity clop
He's out looking for a head to swap
So don't try to figure out a plan
You can't reason with a headless man
~Disney

Reply
#29
(09-03-2011, 08:20 PM)rodentjoe Wrote: Runemaster?

Somewhat hesitant on full-blown Runemasters, as they're essentially a construct for the d20 and didn't really get any sort of spotlight in WoW. That said, the idea of using runes to augment ones abilities is a valid one (and essentially the explanation of the inscription profession) and there's nothing stopping a warrior from learning inscription, putting runes on his body, and equipping fist weapons...

Quote:Techmage?
Steamwarrior?
Candymancer? (ok... I made that one up but still!)

Sure, why not? (Candymancer is just silly, though.)
Have you hugged an orc today?
- I am not tech support. Please do not contact me regarding technical issues. -
Reply
#30
(09-03-2011, 08:53 PM)Grakor456 Wrote:
(09-03-2011, 08:20 PM)rodentjoe Wrote: Runemaster?

Somewhat hesitant on full-blown Runemasters, as they're essentially a construct for the d20 and didn't really get any sort of spotlight in WoW. That said, the idea of using runes to augment ones abilities is a valid one (and essentially the explanation of the inscription profession) and there's nothing stopping a warrior from learning inscription, putting runes on his body, and equipping fist weapons...

Quote:Techmage?
Steamwarrior?
Candymancer? (ok... I made that one up but still!)

Sure, why not? (Candymancer is just silly, though.)

On that note, we can conjure muffins and croissants and bagels and such. The father of one of my characters and teacher of another was a candy-conjurer. So I suppose you could open up a shop where you sell delicious conjured pastries!

...Oh great, now I want candy.

But, I see your point on Runemasters, and it does make sense if one wants a fist-fighter. /nodnod.

Also, does that mean that, on a much more minor note, that Cyan tattoos will be a possibility to get once again?
[Image: 2hhkp3k.gif]
Recommended reads: Divine and Arcane. Also, elves.
Wanna refer me in Tribes: Ascend? Clickies!
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)