06-15-2012, 01:27 PM (This post was last modified: 06-15-2012, 01:28 PM by Piroska.)
Corrected, which only emphasizes how similar they are. One is #336600 and the other is #336666. There's not a lot of disparity between those (and the peon color), which is odd given that trial GM should be highly visible like the other staff ranks. The really bizarre thing is that I cannot find any place on the forums that lists the staff members or groups, which makes it hard to see if the membergroup is even still in use. Or has forum helper replaced it?
I'm still advocating for no change (except for potentially with trial GM) and wish that the poll had such an option.
Edit:
(06-15-2012, 01:25 PM)Clovis Wrote: GMs should clearly be BLACK AS OUR HEARTS AND SOULS.
/hate. It's bad enough entering every thread to mention that, hey, the color combinations people have selected really aren't kind on the eye, but now you propose that?
06-15-2012, 01:36 PM (This post was last modified: 06-15-2012, 01:40 PM by Piroska.)
Excellent! Thank you, Reigen. I was searching on the page for anything involving "group" (membersgroups and so on); I hadn't thought that the word "team" would be utilized. And such a tiny little link alllllll the way at the bottom of the forums index!
(06-15-2012, 01:34 PM)Anski Wrote: I've taken your consideration Piroska and updated the poll accordingly.
I appreciate the addition. However, that option seems to infer that people who feel that no change is warranted think that that your efforts are wrong. Or that our opinions are somehow wrong because they're contrary to your designs. That doesn't really encourage people to select that option. Minor thing, yes, and I'm probably reading far too much into it. However, I've learned to be wary because people so easily misunderstand my words.
(06-15-2012, 01:27 PM)Piroska Wrote: /hate. It's bad enough entering every thread to mention that, hey, the color combinations people have selected really aren't kind on the eye, but now you propose that?
06-15-2012, 02:30 PM (This post was last modified: 06-15-2012, 02:31 PM by Anski.)
(06-15-2012, 01:36 PM)Piroska Wrote: I appreciate the addition. However, that option seems to infer that people who feel that no change is warranted think that that your efforts are wrong. Or that our opinions are somehow wrong because they're contrary to your designs. That doesn't really encourage people to select that option. Minor thing, yes, and I'm probably reading far too much into it. However, I've learned to be wary because people so easily misunderstand my words.
You are reading quite far in to it. This poll really isn't a serious "the winner is really what gets changed to," nor is it officially backed by the staff or something.
Edit: As a result, the no change option has been changed.
06-15-2012, 06:37 PM (This post was last modified: 06-15-2012, 06:40 PM by Spiralin.)
I've always thought that green/yellow was more inviting. As in, back before the groups were all made green. I would've preferred to simply go to green before blue.
Edit: Or maybe even a compromise. I don't think it's very hard to change GM colors, is it? My idea, change it randomly for fun!