A vouch for Brutal Honesty.

[Aphetoros]

I can clearly determine attitude through text. You're my friend Spira, I'm telling you honestly. You're phrasing your posts with attitude...

Please, I don't want you getting in trouble.

[Rigley]

*grabs popcorn*
This won't go unlocked for long.

Honestly, don't ask for brutal honesty. Some people will give just that.

Whats being called for is not flaming, nor outcries of rage. As said above anyone taking me up on the PMs count the same- I'll gladly field questions as long as you keep it respectful.

[Spiralin]

GMs play favoritism more often then it should happen.

[HownDoog]

favoritism

Hey, hey. I'm sensing an attitude. You might want to calm down, bro.

[Rigley]

favoritism

If you are referring to me, my inbox for PMs is open and waiting still.

[Loxmardin]

Calm down, guys. Please. Keep the thread to it's purpose and leave the remarks about others' posts aside for the time being.

[Spiralin]

GMs have no control at times, and become more outraged when put in the hot-seat.

[muhaha8]

There's one thing I have to say, if you want brutal honesty. And it's an extension of Spiralin's statement of favoritism. I'll say this in a question-format. Why is it that people who are "in" with the GMs get approval for things (i.e.- building and spawning things) when anyone else who asks for something small gets an instant no? Anyone who has a decent reason for getting something spawned ahouldn't just be told "We're not allowed to spawn buildings for people or guilds," when the GM who said that turns around and spawn things for others who are "on the inside."

[Spiralin]

GMs sometimes assume too much, and make incorrect assumptions.

[Goarn]

Cut it with the attitude bro.

(I'm not trying to say this with an attitude.)

[Dotsy]

When everyone can get together maturely and voice opinions about what's good and what's bad and how we can improve on it in general, things get done. I mentioned it today, but please don't lose your heads when discussing things. We've all had this problem, I'm sure, but please be kind. You don't need to 'sugar-coat' anything, just don't do the opposite, anyone. (Whatever that may be.)

For my own opinion: Progress takes cooperation from both sides.

[Spiralin]

What do you think is wrong with the team?

Well, here it is, because I am continued to be assumed to having an attitude, I'm answering every question with my small little posts. It's up to the GMs to decide who I'm talking about, but then again as I stated. Sometimes the GM team assume too much. So goodluck with that too, since I can't direct my speech without being said, that I hold an attitude. I'll just list everything. Goodluck fixing the team up.

[Rigley]

There's one thing I have to say, if you want brutal honesty. And it's an extension of Spiralin's statement of favoritism. I'll say this in a question-format. Why is it that people who are "in" with the GMs get approval for things (i.e.- building and spawning things) when anyone else who asks for something small gets an instant no? Anyone who has a decent reason for getting something spawned ahouldn't just be told "We're not allowed to spawn buildings for people or guilds," when the GM who said that turns around and spawn things for others who are "on the inside."

All I can say is that it depends on the GM. It largely is completely to their discretion. GMs have in the past both spawned for guilds and denied spawning for them. It is best to ask the entire GM team and not a single GM by using a PM to the Content Team, and not a single person.


Spiralin, PM me. My offer so far goes unheededby anyone who has been talking about us skimming over issues.

[Spiralin]

GMs are quick to become defensive at moments notice, when they may be in the wrong.

[muhaha8]

Spiralin: Please just stop before you get yourself in trouble.

Rigley: That makes sense, but I've been told the rule is no spawning. Which is why it really irks me when I'm told that, then they spawn things for the next person who asks.